Select the correct option to test your answer:
More Law Questions
Under Section 57 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, a court cannot take judicial notice of:
The Ordinance making power of the President under the Indian Constitution is:
Consider the following statements: 1. Parliament shall, while a proclamation of Emergency is in operation, have the power to make laws of the whole or any part of territory of India with respect to any of the matters enumerated in the list 2. Parliament has exclusive power to make any law with respect to any matter not enumerated in the Concurrent List or State List 3. Parliament has power to make any law for the whole or any part of the territory of India for implementing any treaty, agreement, or convention with any other country 4. Parliament has power to legislate with respect to a matter in the State List in the national interest subject to the resolution passed by the Council of States by two-thirds majority Which of these statements are correct?
Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer: List I List II a. Dishonestly taking property 1. Criminal breach of trust b. Dishonestly inducting any person to deliver property 2. Extortion c. Entrustment of Property 3. Misappropriation d. Appropriating Property obtained as a bailee 4. Theft
Which of the following reasons led to the setting aside of the practice of 'talaqe- biddat', triple talaq in Shayara Bano v. Union of India, (2017) 9 SCC 1? (1) Section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 was a pre-constitutional legislation within the meaning of Article 13(1) and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India on the ground of arbitrariness. (2) Section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 was a pre-constitutional legislation within the meaning of Article 13(1) and violative of Article 15 of the Constitution of India, being discriminatory. (3) Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 is not a law regulating triple talaq but the practice of triple talaq was against the basic tenets of the Holy Quran and no practice against the tenets of Quran was permissible. (4) 'Talaq-e-biddat' is integral to the religious denomination but the Supreme Court may injunct this practice as a means for severing matrimonial relationship.